Re: User requested authorization to join foodsoft-adam-ops
On 19-01-14 05:13, angelo wrote:
Here and there I have seen indications that Adam may
be easier to deploy, etc.
Are you referring to pull request #250,
that's equally usable on foodcoops/foodsoft - and I hope to
integrate that in a couple of days.
The foodcoop-adam/foodsoft repository includes tweaks specific to
the Dutch situation. We've disabled certain things like tasks and
messages (since we use foodsoft a bit differently than most German
foodcoops, I presume). I wouldn't advise anyone else than us to use
it at this moment. I hope eventually be able to use
foodcoops/foodsoft, after it has gotten enough customisation options
If you're interested in certain features present in foodcoop-adam,
please let me/us know. That helps me to prioritise which changes to
get to upstream first.